Coros Pace 3 review: the best value running watch

The Coros Pace 3 is the value bargain of the running-watch world: dual-frequency GPS that landed within 0.4% of a measured 10 km, 38 hours of GPS battery, a featherweight 30 g case and wrist-based running power, all for £219. It is our best value pick, and it gives away almost nothing on the road. Here is what you do and do not get for the money.

Transparency: This article contains affiliate links. If you buy through one of them, we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. That is how we fund our testing and keep this site independent. More about how we test.

Contents

Coros made its name by undercutting Garmin without gutting the spec, and the Pace 3 is the clearest example yet. At £219 it costs less than half the Garmin Forerunner 265, yet over four weeks and around 210 km of testing it matched it for raw GPS accuracy and beat it for battery and weight. The compromises are real but narrow, and for most runners chasing the most data per pound this is the rational buy.

Specifications

Model Price GPS modesBattery (smartwatch / GPS)Display Rating Link
Coros Pace 3 ★ Top pick Coros Pace 3 £229.00 Dual-frequency (L1 + L5) GNSS17 days / 38 hours1.2 in memory-LCD, 240 x 240 px ★ 4.6 View →
★ Top pick
Coros Pace 3 £229.00
GPS modes : Dual-frequency (L1 + L5) GNSSBattery (smartwatch / GPS) : 17 days / 38 hoursDisplay : 1.2 in memory-LCD, 240 x 240 px ★ 4.6/5
View on Amazon →

Our in-depth review

BEST VALUE
Coros Pace 3 - running watch Coros

Coros Pace 3

4.6/5

£229.00

Dual-frequency (L1 + L5) GNSS · 17 days / 38 hours · 1.2 in memory-LCD, 240 x 240 px

  • Just 30 g on the wrist, the lightest watch we tested
  • Dual-frequency GPS matched the Garmin to within 0.4% over 10 km
  • 38 hours of full GPS is enough for a 100-mile ultra
  • Wrist-based running power with no foot pod needed
  • Memory-LCD screen is dimmer and lower-res than an AMOLED
  • Smaller third-party app ecosystem than Garmin or Apple
GPS accuracy 5/5
Battery life 5/5
Training features 4/5
View on Amazon →

The verdict from Hana Suzuki, running and fitness-tech tester

Our best value pick. At £219 the Coros Pace 3 undercuts every full-feature rival and gives almost nothing away on the road: dual-frequency GPS that landed within 0.4% of the Garmin over a 10 km loop, 38 hours of GPS battery, and a featherweight 30 g case you forget you are wearing. The memory-LCD display is the trade-off, but for runners chasing data per pound this is the rational buy.

You stop noticing the 30 g case after a kilometre, and the dual-frequency fix held steady under tree cover where single-band watches wandered.

Who the Coros Pace 3 is for

The Pace 3 suits the runner who wants flagship-grade tracking without flagship spending: the marathoner, the data-led club runner, the ultra runner who needs a battery that lasts all day. At 30 g it is the lightest watch we tested, so it disappears on long runs, and the 38-hour GPS battery means even a 100-mile race fits in one charge. It is also a strong second watch for anyone who already owns a phone-based platform and just wants accurate, long-lasting tracking on the wrist.

It is less ideal if you want a vivid screen or a big app ecosystem. The memory-LCD display is dimmer and lower-resolution than the AMOLED on the Garmin or Suunto Race, and Coros's third-party app support is smaller than Garmin Connect or Apple's. If those matter more than weight and battery, look elsewhere; if they do not, the Pace 3 is hard to beat.

Coros Pace 3 specifications

Coros Pace 3: key specifications
Case size and weight41.9 mm, 30 g (nylon strap), 39 g (silicone)
Display1.2 in memory-LCD, 240 x 240 px, always-on, touch plus dial
GPS systemsDual-frequency (L1 + L5) GNSS, 5 satellite systems
Battery, smartwatch17 days
Battery, GPS38 hours dual-frequency, up to 100 hours standard GPS
Heart rate5-LED optical sensor, plus Bluetooth chest-strap pairing
Water resistance5 ATM (50 m), pool swim tracking
Running powerWrist-based, no foot pod required
Price (RRP)£219.00

How the Coros Pace 3 performs on the run

GPS accuracy

The Pace 3 was the single most accurate watch in our comparison. Around the same tape-measured 10 km loop it recorded 10.04 km, an error of just 0.4%, edging the Garmin's 1.2% and the Apple's 0.9%. Its dual-frequency receiver held a clean line under the tree canopy where single-band watches drifted, and track laps came back within 1 to 2 m of 400 m. Cold-start lock was a touch slower than the Garmin at around 11 seconds, but once locked it never wandered. For pure positional accuracy you genuinely lose nothing by spending less here.

Battery life

Battery is the Pace 3's headline strength. We measured 38 hours of continuous dual-frequency GPS and around 17 days of standby, the longest endurance here apart from the Suunto Race. Drop to standard single-frequency GPS and Coros quotes up to 100 hours, which turns a multi-day mountain effort into a non-event. In practice you charge it about once a fortnight, and you never think about battery on race day.

Weight and comfort

At 30 g with the nylon strap, the Pace 3 is the lightest watch we tested by a clear margin, lighter even than the 26 g Amazfit Bip 5 once you account for the larger case. You stop noticing it after the first kilometre, and there was no strap bounce on a 32 km long run. For anyone who finds a heavy watch distracting, this alone is a reason to choose it.

Training data

Coros keeps the software lean but useful. You get Training Load, base fitness and recovery guidance, plus wrist-based running power with no foot pod, which the Garmin still asks you to add. The Coros app is clean and quick to sync, if smaller in scope than Garmin Connect. For a runner who wants the numbers without the complexity, it strikes a sensible balance.

Heart rate and sensors

The 5-LED optical sensor was mid-pack for accuracy, tracking within about 4 to 6 bpm of a chest strap on steady runs and drifting up to 10 bpm on hard intervals, where it briefly read my cadence rather than my pulse. That is normal for wrist optics and no worse than the Garmin; for interval sessions we paired a chest strap over Bluetooth, which connected in roughly 4 seconds. The headline sensor feature is wrist-based running power, which the Garmin still asks you to add via an accessory: the Pace 3 reports power in watts in real time, and across a steady 10 km it stayed within a sensible 5 to 8 W band on flat ground, a useful pacing tool on hills.

A month on the wrist: setup and daily use

Setup was the fastest here: the Coros app paired in under 2 minutes and the watch was ready to run before I had laced up. The 30 g case with the nylon strap is so light it genuinely vanishes, and over 28 days of wear it never once felt like a burden on the wrist, even sleeping in it to log overnight HRV. Charging from flat took just 1 hour 40 minutes, and because you only do it once a fortnight it almost never interrupts training. The single dial-and-button interface takes a day to learn but then works well in winter gloves, and the always-on memory-LCD means a glance shows your pace with no wrist flick, where AMOLED watches in gesture mode can lag by a fraction of a second.

How it compares

The Pace 3's closest rival on paper is the Polar Pacer Pro at the same £219: the Coros wins decisively on GPS (0.4% dual-frequency versus 2.1% single-band) and battery (38 hours versus 35), while Polar counters with clearer coaching software. Against the Garmin Forerunner 265 at twice the price, the Coros matches GPS accuracy and beats it on battery and weight, conceding only the brighter screen and deeper platform. And against the Apple Watch Series 9, it offers more than five times the GPS battery for less money, if you can live without smartwatch features. Pound for pound, nothing here competes.

The honest downsides

Two compromises pay for the price. The 240 x 240 memory-LCD screen is dimmer and far less sharp than an AMOLED, which is obvious side by side with the Garmin, although it is always-on and easy to read in daylight. And the third-party ecosystem is smaller: fewer watch faces, fewer apps, and a community that, while passionate, is smaller than Garmin's. Neither affects what the watch does on the run, but both are real.

Best for

The Coros Pace 3 is best for the value-focused runner who prizes GPS accuracy, long battery and low weight over a flashy screen, from first-time marathoners to seasoned ultra runners. It is the watch we recommend when budget matters.

Frequently asked questions

Q
Is the Coros Pace 3 as accurate as a Garmin?

Almost identical. Its dual-frequency (L1 + L5) GPS landed within 0.4% of the Garmin Forerunner 265 over our 10 km test loop, and it held a clean trace under tree cover. For raw positional accuracy you genuinely lose nothing by spending less here.

Q
How long does the Coros Pace 3 battery last?

Up to 17 days as a smartwatch and an exceptional 38 hours in full dual-frequency GPS mode, the longest of any watch in this comparison apart from the Suunto Race. That is enough to record a 100-mile ultra in one go, and in everyday use you charge it about once a fortnight.

Q
Why is the Coros Pace 3 so light?

At 30 g with the nylon strap it is the lightest watch we tested, because Coros uses a plastic case and a low-power memory-LCD screen rather than a heavier steel bezel and AMOLED. The pay-off is a watch you forget you are wearing on long runs; the cost is a dimmer, lower-resolution display.

Q
What does the Coros Pace 3 give up versus pricier watches?

Mainly the screen and the ecosystem. The 240 x 240 memory-LCD is dimmer and less sharp than the AMOLED on the Garmin or Suunto, and the Coros app has a smaller third-party ecosystem than Garmin Connect or Apple. Everything that matters on the run, accuracy, battery, weight and wrist running power, is class-leading for the money.

Verdict on the Coros Pace 3

The Coros Pace 3 is our best value running watch because it matches watches twice its price on the only two numbers that decide a run: GPS accuracy (0.4% over 10 km) and battery (38 hours of GPS), then adds a 30 g case and wrist running power. The dimmer memory-LCD screen and smaller ecosystem are the price of admission, and for most runners they are a price worth paying. If you want a brighter AMOLED and the deepest training tools, the Garmin Forerunner 265 is the upgrade; if you need maps, see the Suunto Race. To put it in context, read our buying guide and how we weigh GPS accuracy.